
HIM has been best described by the press as "Depeche Mode meets
Dimmu Borgir in a David Lynch movie," though by now the band has
coined the phrase "love metal" to summarize its sound which
Valo explains as, "music that includes elements of pop, metal,
goth, glam...it's music inspired by the feelings
you have before the first touch, before the
first kiss." Love
metal is music that embraces emotion but also
pours you a drink. It's a love letter signed
in blood but sealed with Jack Daniel's, not
with a kiss. It makes your heart ache but it
also raises your eyebrow and makes your lip
curl. It's foreplay that skips the sex and goes straight
for the post-coital cigarette. It's watching
your lover sleep only to realize that you
can't get Black Sabbath's "Crazy Train" out from stuck in
your mind. From their humble beginnings in
Helsinki, Finland in 1995 to playing sold out
gigs across Europe four critically acclaimed
albums later, HIM has brought European
rock romanticism a higher level of musicianship and an irresistibly charming
attitude to match. Completed by Mige on bass, Linde on guitar, Gas on drums and
Burton on keyboards, the band first garnered widespread attention for its impressive
cover of Chris Issak's "Wicked Game," but have since built an expansive
musical catalog that swaggers its way right on past the road sign that points
to one-hit-wonders. HIM has rightly earned its legions of admirers, some of which
include Ozzy Osbourne (who has invited the band on tour), pro-skater and Jackass
star Bam Margera (who directed two of HIM's music videos to date), and actress
Juliette Lewis (who starred in one of those videos). European shores secure,
HIM decided to bring its music stateside and re-released Razorblade Romance on
Universal Records on October 28, finally making the album
available in America whereas before it could only be bought as an import. Excited
about HIM's American debut, Ville Valo took a few hours out of his vacation time
in Finland to talk about songwriting, art, and why he doesn't think he'll ever
need a prescription for Prozac.
Let's talk about your role as a songwriter and,
with that, the ability to marry dream with
reality - to marry melody with emotional significance. How do
you see yourself within this
framework?
Ville Valo: I'm kind of schizophrenic when
it comes to music. I like all sorts, all shapes and all kinds. It's
like Gene Simmons with ladies, me with music. My parents used to
listen to old melancholic Finnish folk music so that's maybe where
the sadness comes into my music. I also grew up with Neil Diamond,
Neil Young, Johnny Cash and Cat Stevens - all those folky songwriters
- and in my teen years I listened to heavy metal. With HIM I didn't
want to get rid of any of those influences but hopefully create
a unique cocktail with all those elements in there. It's really
hard for me to separate the fantasy from the reality in the music
because I live my life in the music that I write. I'm like a very
sociable hermit.
Do you feel that, as a songwriter, there is a certain responsibility
with words to bridge the gap between the abstract communication
of music and more literal verbal communication?
I think it's a bit different because I didn't
grow up in an English speaking family. I learned
my English from television. Language is always
very visual for me and very musical
as well. I like to chew on words, like tobacco.
I like to taste the words and I like how they
look. I can't do the same in Finnish. When I was a
bit younger I tried to write in Finnish as well
but when a language is so deep inside of you
its hard to get rid of all the cliches. It's
easier to play around with the words when you're
not speaking them everyday. But the responsibility
with words is definitely towards
myself. It also depends on the [listener]. Some
people claim that we're Satanic and lead the
youth into despair. Others claim it to
be very cathartic that they can live through
their bullshit through our music. That's how
music was for me. When I felt sad in the mornings
I'd listen to Black Sabbath and all the aggression
and melancholic aspects in the music helped
me to get through it - to take those few
steps into the kitchen and make myself a cup
of coffee and go to school. Music for me is
like cleaning up your psyche. There's always going
to be conversations about the responsibility
of music or art in general but you never know
what's going to effect somebody. In Europe once,
we had a big drama going on because some dude
killed himself and when he was found he had
our song "Join Me in Death" in
his Walkman. Then again, I've had maybe a hundred
letters from people saying that
particular song really helped them out. Nowadays,
if Romeo and Juliet were published it'd probably
be banned. I'm not claiming that I'm
William Shakespeare number two but still I think
that there has to be the right to sing about
whatever you want.
Absolutely. I think that sometimes people
can be quick to label melancholy as negative.
But like you said in regards to those letters
you got, sometimes there can be something beautiful
that comes out of those feelings. It's denial
to imply that the dark side of human emotion
doesn't exist.
Exactly. I was such a desperate, depressed
prick when I started doing music when I was
12 or 13 years old and first fell in love with
a girl and she fell in love with my best friend.
[That's when] I wrote my first song. Since
then I've found that it's a lot cheaper to
write songs that to go to psychotherapy. I'm
not into the drug-fueled medical system that's
going on in the world, where you go to a doctor
and they always give you a pill. That's just
bullshit because nobody knows how the brain
really functions. I don't think that the human
psyche works that way. I do loads of drugs
because I'm an asthmatic. I have to do loads
of cortisone just to be able to breathe. But
if I'm depressed I'd rather talk to my friends
and try to get rid of it by whatever means
necessary but not [with drugs]. Maybe I've
never been in such a bad state of mind that
I'd need to go through all that. But maybe
it will happen one day and then I'd say totally
the opposite.
Continuing with songwriting, let's talk about
lyrical literalism versus posing questions
and allowing the listener to arrive at his
or her own conclusions. Do you think there
is a danger in explaining too much?
It's the same difference like between porn
and eroticism. It's a lot more interesting
for the mind to be able to create its own stories.
It's great food for the imagination. It's the
same with lyrics - you have to give a bit but
not too much, otherwise it kills all the magic.
For me, with Black Sabbath or Jane's Addiction,
when I've heard some of the stories behind
the songs it sort of took away the magic. I
don't know how it is with our stuff because
our stuff is pretty personal. I'm such an egoistic
bastard, you know, that I'm always writing
about myself and my relationship towards the
world (laughs).
It sounds like you would agree then that there
can be a danger in explaining too much and
that sometimes a great song is one that poses
questions and leaves room for growth with the
listener.
Exactly. It's lovely to have conversations
or fights about lyrics with your friends. It's
weird because nowadays it seems people aren't
into music to really try to discover the essence
of lyrics or really feel them. There's so much
bullshit around - so many people just whining
about driving under palm trees with their fancy
Hummers and whining about how hard it is to
live. That's not real because it doesn't touch
anybody's hearts. Only one percent of the world
has fast cars and maybe two percent have silicone
boobies. But everybody's got a heart. Everybody's
got imagination. Everybody's got good days
and bad days. That's what I'm writing about
personally. That's the only thing I know something
about. [As far as] the writing process, I think
it's best when it just happens, almost subliminally.
When you're sort of surprised yourself that
your hand has been writing things down on a
piece of paper and you're like, "What
the fuck's going on?" I don't want to
think of writing music as a mathematical process.
For me, I pick up a guitar and have a good
time playing it and writing a song. Hopefully
it turns out to be a beautiful song that I'll
really like. And hopefully, after that, there
are people who will like it and hopefully the
process of getting that particular song on
tape works in a way that everybody's happy.
That's the whole thing. Then comes in the business
side of it, marketing and that bullshit. It's
so complicated that I really don't want to
think about it. I don't want to become a businessman.
I consider myself maybe to be a musician but
maybe like a sonic plumber. I plumb out all
the bullshit from myself through the music.
It's like mantras or ohms. My songs are my
mantras. That's the only way I can forget about
my existence and just be.
What is the songwriting process like for you?
It's always a bit different. I usually come
up with the music first, the melodies. I tend
to have mood swings in a way that I can start
a song as a ballad, have totally different
lyrics and then all of a sudden within two
weeks decide that it has to be an Iggy Pop
and the Stooges rip off. Its always different
because everyday you feel different. I've been
writing music about 13-14 years now and I still
don't know what it's all about. And I don't
want to know. It's a weird thing and, like
we were just talking about, it's magical in
a way. I don't want to ruin it by being too
analytical. The best way for me to express
my emotions is through music, not through lyrics,
because a single word can mean millions of
different things to different people. Saying, "I
love you" is such a different thing for
so many people. For some people it's a cool
thing, for some it's coy, for some it's fantasy,
for some it's a grim reality. That's the reason
why I don't like lyrics as much. I tend to
think that the lyrics, in a way, just color
up the music and tell its story. [The lyrics]
just give a clue about the emotion that the
music expresses.
Are you more concerned with the lyrical narrative
or the sound of the words you're singing ?
Both.
I work hard at the lyrics and hopefully they're
good enough for some people. I really
do take pride in both. I'm not making compromises.
I've got a rhythm and a melody and that kind
of helps me to pick out the right words. But
I want to create stories as well. I really
like strong language, verbally, so that's one
of the reasons I use religious terminology.
I love the word "redemption." I love
that, as Russian writers once used to do, if
I write about going to a grocery store and
seeing a pretty lady, I make that tiny 15 seconds
a heartbreaking moment. I like to exaggerate
a lot. I must be a romantic or whatever but
that's what I like to do lyrically.
After listening to Razorblade Romance, I came
away feeling it was a sweet yet sad love letter
directed towards what I see these days as people's
tendency to replace honesty of the heart with
cynicism. In working a lot with themes that
convey a certain longing, do you ever find
it difficult to break through that collective
cynicism?
Not really because I just do what I do. I consider
our music to have loads of humorous sides to
it as well, especially the lyrics. I take my
work seriously but I don't take myself seriously.
Whenever I wake up in the morning and look
into the mirror, I usually laugh. It's the
same with my lyrics. I don't want them to be
too overwhelming, too big or too romantic.
There has to be some humorous little wink of
an eye so that even if your heart's completely
breaking and you're feeling like a little slug
that somebody wants to crush under his or her
feet, that you can still just laugh about it.
But I know what you mean about the cynicism
going around in the world. It's terrible. I
think that people are either too honest or
too cynical. I think to be a functional human
being you have to be something in-between.
I'm a bit of a wanker, you know. I've been
kicked in the balls way too many times but
I'm not writing about that. It's about the
cathartic element, the purification through
music and through lyrics - that's how I see
rock music at its best. There are loads of
musicians who have brilliant lyrics but where's
the music? Then there are loads of great bands
that are musically ingenious but [have] no
lyrical substance at all. Very few people can
put them both together. And I'm not claiming
that I'm doing that but I'm trying and hopefully
one day, with a song or two, I will be able
to have a perfect marriage of those two things.
I listen to shitty music too though, silly
pop music. Not all music has to be brilliant
in every way. There are a few bands though,
like Faith No More with Mike Patton who did
Angel Dust, which is one of my favorite albums.
It's the album I learned how to sing with.
I would skip school and put that on full blast
from the stereos at my parents' place and sing
to it. When an album like that comes out and
you buy it from a record store, put it on and
you're blown away - that really gives me the
energy to go on because I [also] consider myself
a fan. I'm not reinventing the wheel. And loads
of people think they are.
I understand that in addition to music you
paint as well. How did that start for you?
When I was younger I went to art school but
then had to make a decision between graphic
arts and music. I was pretty good but I just
didn't have the time. I'm really happy that
with music there are so many visual things
going on when talking about the album sleeve
artwork or creating videos. It's great that
you can do so many things at the same time.
That's what I like about music - that it's
not just about me having an acoustic guitar
on my lap. There's always a good reason to
throw that acoustic guitar away for a few moments
and think about something else.
Music can bring together so many different
artistic forms.
Yeah, there are good examples like Marilyn
Manson who's done it all. I don't particularly
like any of his art but I'm glad that he's
been able to paint and all that. It just doesn't
personally touch my heart.
He had a gallery opening in Los Angeles awhile
back and I remember driving by and seeing people
lined up for blocks to get in. I couldn't help
but ask myself whether or not all those people
would still be lined up if he weren't Marilyn
Manson.
Well it's sort of great and it's what I've
always said about Miles Davis. He used to prove
himself as a superior jazz musician doing all
the classic jazz albums. Then when he was on
top of the world with loads of money he was
just able to shoot up heroin and create the
shittiest free jazz albums in the world (laughs).
That's beautiful. That's what we all crave
- to be on top of our hills and just pee on
everybody (laughs). It seems to be the same
case with Marilyn to a certain extent that
he had to prove himself commercially first
and now people are interested in whatever he
does. That's cool in a way because it's not
easy. Poets and painters may claim that that's
bullshit but who the fuck cares. Marilyn had
that two-mile queue, had all the interest and
sold most of his work. What's good and what's
bad art? Art is also about a person's character
and that they've created something you can
have. You don't want to have it because of
what it is; you want to have it because of
who it's from, with some people. Salvador Dali
for example, I don't like his work at all.
It's technically good but what I am really
into when talking about Dali, is his own life.
He is a piece of art. He was such a controversial
personality that if I had a print of one of
his works on my wall - thank god I don't by
the way - but if I did, when I'd look at it
I'd remember that mustache, that crazy look
and everything I've heard or read about him.
That's how I see music and art. A song can
be like a page in a diary. It's like a time
machine. I can always go back to that moment
and in a way, re-live that sentiment.
Do you see certain parallels between music
and painting?
To be honest with you, I haven't thought about
it too much because I usually hate painters.
I love photography but I don't like other visual
art so much. For me, music is a lot better
[than painting] in that music is painting I
do sonically. The frame is the cheap plastic
CD and the whole essence of it is in a piece
of plastic that you play and then there's 50
minutes of painting. I think art is there to
fuck up your senses. A sculpture or a painting
can be really musical and a song can be very
visual. I don't separate those things because
music for me is always visual. Books are really
visual as well. I think that most books are
more interesting than paintings.
The interesting thing about books and music,
as opposed to painting, is that they're so
cerebral - they exist visually only in your
head, as opposed to visually in front of your
eyes.
Exactly. I love that there are so many different
views on all that. Like, what's the percentage
of [people who appreciate] the visuality of
music? And I'm not talking about cover art;
I'm talking about the actual music. It's always
interesting. With books, some people only read
the words black on white and some people paint
pictures in their heads. It doesn't really
matter though because it's not a competition.
And thank god it's not a competition because
no one can really know how beautiful the pictures
are in your head.
The other day I read an interview with Brian
Molko of Placebo where he talked about what
he saw as the difference between art and entertainment,
mainly being that entertainment is there to
distract you. Do you see music as a form of
escapism or more as something to communicate
a particular realism?
For me it's just getting out of yourself, looking
at yourself and looking at what the world is
really about - to try to not be so chained
into the piece of flesh that the human being
is. It's like escapism to come back. I don't
know what our music does for people. As a songwriter,
I haven't talked to so many people about it.
I don't know whether it is escapism to just
get away for a second. That's what I consider
entertainment to be about - to forget about
your existence for a second and to enjoy it.
Good music for me is not forgetting who you
are. It's not forgetting what sort of situation
you're in. It's not necessarily even giving
you any hope or understanding. It's just giving
you a bit of relief. Maybe it's like turning
back the hands of time for a second to think
about the decisions you've made and the decisions
you're going to make in the future. When I
fall in love with a song, there's no time.
That's what good music does. It's having your
intellect working at the same time as your
heart, on the same level, with both of them
understanding each other. It can be really
sensual. Rage Against the Machine was a great
example of that. They were really conscious
and had loads of things to say but still their
musical vibe was so strong that both were on
the same level. It's that balance.
And when music doesn't have that balance?
I don't really consider that to be the band's
fault. I think that there are too many people
who started doing music just to get somewhere
else, to use music as a ladder to have wealth
or credibility. And that's not a good reason
to do music. You should do music because
you love music and you want to do just music
for the sake of it. Record companies follow
trends because they are there to create
money. But we as musicians don't have to follow
their rules. We can do whatever we want. Of course
it'd be really nice if I someday bought my own
apartment. But if not I'd rather be sleeping
under a bridge doing what I do and having a good
time while doing it. I don't believe that musicality
has anything to do with commercial mathematics.
You can't just calculate it because that's like
selling your soul to the devil, and I'm not talking
about the good, old-fashioned rock and roll devil.
I'm talking about the real evil that lies in
the industry and the whole situation nowadays,
especially with popular music. It's complicated
but I'm not blaming anybody. I feel that there
seem to be very few defenders of the faith left
doing it because they really love music and that's
the only way they can express themselves. It's
a cruel world nowadays but its cool that there
are wankers around as well because that always
makes you question what you are here for. One
of my musical gods has always been Neil Young
because he's never done what people expect from
him. He's done shitty albums, he's done good
albums. But he's still here, still popular and
can still touch many people's hearts and do beautiful
music whenever he feels like it. He's one that
gives me strength.
Lets talk about HIM and how the band dynamic
functions both live and in the studio. Do you
have a preference?
You can't really compare because it's more
of a drum circle, ritualistic thing when you
play a gig. There's the natural drug, adrenaline,
which goes through your body. I didn't like
performing live for years. I didn't feel comfortable
and was always kind of anxious to get off the
stage. But nowadays it feels better. Originally
I used to play different instruments - bass
guitar, drums, guitar and a bit of keyboards.
This is the first band I've sung in and that's
the reason it took like 6 years and 400 gigs
for me to get rid of the cigarette in one hand
and the bottle of beer or red wine in the other.
I was just so nervous I didn't know what to
do with my hands. Performing live is still
pretty difficult for me but I'm a good actor.
Why so difficult?
It's really weird to be put on a pedestal with
thousands of people clapping their hands
to the song you wrote like a year and a half
ago sitting on your bed wearing your underwear
because you felt so fucking bad. It's a thing
my brain doesn't compute to a certain extent
but I'm getting used to it. I hate being
in the studio because it's so boring. It
wears you out so easily when a good song
just happens - you're sitting back at home
creating the skeleton, then at the rehearsal
place you're putting on the organs and in
the studio your putting on the skin, all
the final touches. Then you're like, "Wow,
did this really come somewhere from my heart?" That's
great. Creating is always wonderful but its
like a never-ending story because when you
take that song, put it in your live set and
you play it like 400-500 times, it changes
a lot. A song is an ever-growing process.
It's never finished, which is a bad thing
in a way. It's not like a painting that when
you finish it, it's finished and then you
just don't touch it. A song keeps on going
which is pretty scary. I was laughing my
ass off when we played this one festival
in Europe. There were like 60,000 people
and [we were playing] our song "Join
Me in Death" which is this Romeo and
Juliet sort of song. I was in a really bad
relationship and asking myself whether I
was in love enough to be letting it all go
just for that particular person. It's not
about suicide, that song. It's about giving
it all away.
Like a figurative death.
Yeah, exactly. But seeing thousands of people
at the festival shouting [the lyric] "This
life ain't worth living"...I was like, "For
fuck's sake!" (Laughs) It's just mad
because I just wrote that song to get that
shit out of my system and all of a sudden
it became a huge hit here in Europe. Eleven-year-old
little German kiddies were singing, "This
life ain't worth living." It's pretty
weird.
That must have been a surreal moment.
I can tell you it was! And it still is. That's
where the fun comes in and you just have
to laugh. For fuck's sake, I was listening
to Ozzy Osbourne back in '86 and now I'm
here and there's thousands of people singing
along to my lyrics which 90 percent of those
people probably don't have the slightest
idea what they mean.
Do you think its necessary for your audience
to know what your lyrics mean?
There's a fine line. When you're saying, "This
life ain't worth living" I think that
you should at least know what that one line
means. I've never told the exact meanings of
my songs because what I write about is so personal
I just try to hide it behind different masks.
I can say that I was in a shitty mood or bad
situation in my life but that's one of the
reasons there is a thing called art or music...just
to get rid of all that excrement.
How do you maintain your calm on stage when
there are 60,000 people shouting back your
lyrics?
Adrenaline is a wonderful thing. And maybe
2 beers before the gig (laughs). It's a weird
situation because I never thought I was going
to find myself standing on stage with so many
people [in the audience]. But so far I'm enjoying
every moment. It feels like one day I'm going
to wake up in a room and find out that its
all been an LSD experiment in the Finnish military.
When it comes to the business aspect of things,
what finally led to signing with Universal
Records and making the transition over to America?
Originally we signed to BMG here in Europe
but for some reason BMG America was never interested
in what we did. It took a long time to get
a deal and now that it's happened, I'm pretty
happy. I've been laughing to myself that we've
rehearsed for America in Europe for the past
five years so I think we're ready. We've had
loads of practice so we're feeling pretty good
about it. The world is such a big place that
I'm really proud of our band taking these little
baby steps. I can't ask for more. I've had
so much already. Of course, I'm going to be
disappointed if we're not the first band on
the moon or if I'm not going to be able to
sleep in the same oxygen tent with Michael
Jackson and Bubbles the monkey (laughs).
You don't want your own Neverland?
(Laughs) Not really. I've never liked kids
so much and I'm allergic to monkeys so no,
I don't want a mansion where nobody can see
me. I want to be out walking around saying
hello to people. I'm really happy to have
been able to support myself and rent an apartment
and pay my own bills for the past couple
of years. And I'm happy that four of my old
school mates and friends are still in the
band and that we can laugh, play cards on
the tour bus and not mention the word money.
We're all just big fans and lovers of music.
That's beautiful. We've had bad moments with
the band as well but that's how it always
is with people you love. It's natural. But
at this particular moment we're in really
good shape and feeling good about the future.
We're going to take off some time early next
year so that hopefully if everything works
out we'd be able to come over to play a few
gigs. It'd be great for the mentality of
the band because we've been touring in Europe
for such a long time that it'd be a good
kick in the ass to meet new people, see new
clubs and sweat like hell to get the audience
on our side. It'd be one dream fulfilled,
one mission accomplished, just to get over.
It doesn't really matter whether there's
only 15 people in the audience.
It could be a great 15 people.
Exactly. That's what I'm really proud of, that's
how it's always been for us. For example,
the first time we played in England there
were maybe 18 people and a dog. And we just
had a great time because we were there. Then
the next time around there was like 200 hundred
people and the next time there was even more.
We're just proud that we've been doing so
much touring even though there are some record
companies that say, "Don't come over
here and tour." We've been like, "Fuck
off, we'll tour wherever we want to." It's
really rewarding when you can pick the fruit
of your work straight from the tree, as we
say here in Europe, and when you see the
whole thing grow right before your own eyes.